I have some expertise in education policy, international economics, and macroeconomics. However, most of my published research could best be described as “applied microeconomics”, including evaluation studies, small business development, and innovation. My main contribution to research projects tends to be through the application of generic skills in applied econometric analysis and meta-regression analysis.
Research on innovation and SME development
Quartile 1 journals (with ABS journal ranking and H-index)*
-
Radicic, D. and Pugh, G. (2017). Performance Effects of External Search Strategies in European Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12328 (ABS=3; H=67)
-
Dimos, C. and Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: a meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy 45, 797–815. First published on-line, 02-02-2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002 (ABS=4; H=160)
-
Radicic, D., Pugh, G., Hollanders, H., Wintjes, R. and Fairburn, J. (2016). The impact of innovation support programs on small and medium enterprises innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven European Union regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(8): 1425-1452. doi:10.1177/0263774X15621759 (ABS=3; H=47)
-
Gashi, P., Hashi, I. and Pugh, G. (2014). Export Behaviour of SMEs in Transition Countries, Small Business Economics: An Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol.42(2):407–435: DOI 10.1007/s11187-013-9487-7 (ABS=3; H=82)
-
Wyld, J., Tyrrall, D. and Pugh, G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of progressive beer duty on small breweries: a case study of tax breaks to promote SMEs. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy 28(2), 225-240. (ABS=3; H=47)
-
Dimos, C., Pugh, G., Hisarciklilar, M., Talam, E. and Jackson, I. (2022). The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative Meta-Regression Analysis, Technovation, 115 (July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102450
(ABS: 3; H=130)
-
Radicic, D., Pugh, G. and Douglas, D. (2020). Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: Evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs, Small Business Economics, 54: 257-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0088-3 (ABS: 3; H.=108)
- Radicic, D., Pugh, G. Douglas, D. and Jackson, I. (2019). Cooperation for innovation and its impact on technological and non-technological innovations: empirical evidence for European SMEs in traditional manufacturing industries, International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500464 (ABS: 2; H=34)
Quartile 2 journals (with H-index)*
-
Radicic, D. and Pugh, G. (2016). R&D programmes, policy mix, and the “European Paradox”: evidence from European SMEs, Science and Public Policy. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw077 (ABS=2; H=42)
-
Wyld, J., Pugh, G., Tyrrall, D. 2012. Can Powerful Buyers “Exploit” SME Suppliers? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. Vol.19, Issue 2 (May 2012), 322-334. (ABS=2; H=29)
Working Papers and work-in-progress
-
Radicic, D. and Pugh, G. (2017b). Innovation policy mix: evidence on complementarity between supply-side support and public procurement. EU-SPRI conference, Vienna, 7-9 June 2017.
-
Radicic, D., Pugh, G., Hollanders, H. and Wintjes, R. (2014). The impact of innovation support programmes on SME innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: an evaluation for seven EU regions. UNU-MERIT Working Papers Series No. 2014-033.
-
Wintjes, R., Douglas, D. Fairburn, J., Hollanders, H. and Pugh, G. (2014). Beyond product innovation; improving innovation policy support for SMEs in traditional industries. UNU-MERIT Working Papers ISSN 1871-9872. Maastricht Economic and social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, UNU-MERIT #2014-032.
*According to The Association of Business Schools (ABS) Academic Journal Quality Guide (2015 - see http://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015-view/ Journals are ranked 4 (highest), 3, 2 or 1 (roughly corresponding to the RAE/REF assessment grades).
The Quartile ranking and H-Index are from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank. This is a publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.).
Source: SCImago Journal & Country Rank - http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=18768&tip=sid&clean=0
-
Quartile (Q): The set of journals (i.e. all journals in a subject area such as Economics and Econometrics, Business, Management and Accounting, etc.) have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles – namely, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4.
-
H Index: The h index expresses the journal's number of articles (h) that have received at least h citations. It quantifies both journal scientific productivity and scientific impact and it is also applicable to scientists, countries, etc.
Evaluation experience
My experience of evaluation includes an EU Framework 7 project to evaluate business support measures for SMEs in traditional manufacturing sectors: GPrix - “Good Practices in Innovation Support Measures for SMEs” (2010-12) (http://www.gprix.eu/). I led the UK team and the econometric analysis. This gave rise to most of the publications on innovation listed above. For UK National Government, I had previously led a quantitative evaluation project for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DfCSF) (for the 2008 Report, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/resources-and-attainment-at-key-stage-4-estimates-from-a-dynamic-methodology; a subsequent paper was published in Europe’s leading education journal and was “commended” at the 2012 Conference of the British Educational Research Association). In 2012, I collaborated with colleagues at the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) to design the implementation of the Technology Strategy Board (TSB) support programme Innovation Vouchers in the Agri-food, Built Environment and Aerospace sectors – in particular, the random assignment of vouchers – so that the effectiveness of the programme could be evaluated by a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) approach. At local level, I led a two-year evaluation of the London Borough of Newham’s Reading Guarantee Programme (2012-14), which is notable for its longitudinal dimension and “difference-in-difference” approach. In 2017-18, in collaboration with Professor David Williamson and Mayowa Akinbote, I completed an evaluation project commissioned by Stoke-on-Trent & Staffordshire Enterprise Partnership with a report entitled: “Evaluating the impact of different modes of implementing food hygiene regulations on business compliance.”
Most recently, with David Tyrrall, I co-authored an unpublished submission to HM Treasury’s Small Brewers Relief: Technical Consultation (January 2021). HMT’s Small Brewers Relief: Technical Consultation Response (November 2021) extensively references our submission (pp.10-11; also p.26). Extensive reference to our evaluation was made also by the Society for Independent Brewers (SIBA).
Education Policy Research
My applied research in policy and programme evaluation overlaps with my research on education policy. My main areas of educational research have been: the dynamics of school performance; the effects of school spending on pupil attainment; and the effects of school links with faith communities on pupil attainment.
According to the comprehensive ERA rankings, all of my papers in the field of education policy have been published in A* or A ranked journals. (ERA: Australian Research Council (ARC): Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Outlet Ranking (2010); scholarly, peer reviewed journals are ranked A*; A; B; C http://research.unsw.edu.au/excellence-research-australia-era-outlet-ranking, whereby: A* (top 5%) 'Virtually all papers they publish will be of a very high quality'; A (next 15%) 'The majority of papers in a Tier A journal will be of very high quality'; B (next 30%) 'Generally, in a Tier B journal, one would expect only a few papers of very high quality'; and C (next 50%) Journals 'that do not meet the criteria of higher tiers'.)
A* ranked journals:
-
Pugh, G., Mangan J., Blackburne, V. and Radicic D. (2014). School Expenditure and School Performance: Evidence from New South Wales schools using a dynamic panel analysis, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3146
-
Pugh, G., Mangan J. and Gray, J. (2011) Do increased resources increase educational attainment during a period of rising expenditure? Evidence from English secondary schools using a dynamic panel analysis, British Educational Research Journal, Volume 37, Issue 1, (2011).
-
Pugh, G. and, Telhaj, S. (2008) Faith schools, social capital and academic attainment: evidence from TIMSS-R mathematics scores in Flemish secondary schools, British Educational Research Journal, Vol.34, No.2 (April), pp.235-67.
-
Pugh, G., Davies, P. and Adnett, N. (2006) Should we have faith in not-for-profit providers of schooling?, Journal of Education Policy, Vol.21, No.1 (Jan.), pp.19-33.
-
Pugh, G. and Mangan, J. (2003) What’s in a trend? A comment on Gray, Goldstein and Thomas (2001), British Educational Research Journal, Vol.29, No.1, pp.77-82.
-
Lange, T. and Pugh, G. (1997) High-tech investment and learning-by-doing: an alternative training strategy, Education and Training, Vol.39, Nos.8-9 (November) pp.316-21.
A ranked journals:
-
Mangan J. and Pugh, G. (2005) Changes in Examination Performance in English Secondary Schools over the Course of a Decade, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol.16, No.1 (March) pp.29-50.
-
Pugh, G., Adnett, N. and Coates, G. (2005). Performance Indicators and Widening Participation in UK Higher Education, Higher Education Quarterly, Vol.59, No.1 (2005) pp.19-39.